<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Space Technology &#187; Albert Einstein</title> <atom:link href="http://www.contour2002.org/topic/albert-einstein/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.contour2002.org</link> <description>All about space research and technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 02:49:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>Timeline of electromagnetism and classical optics &#8211; Introduction</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/timeline-of-electromagnetism-and-classical-optics-introduction</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/timeline-of-electromagnetism-and-classical-optics-introduction#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:51:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Electromagnetism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Aberration of light]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert michelson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Angle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arago spot]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Aristophanes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arnold sommerfeld]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Augustin fresnel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Benjamin franklin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Birefringence]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Black body]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Book of optics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cabaeus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Charles h. townes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Charles-augustin de coulomb]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Christiaan huygens]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Color]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Compass]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Coulomb's law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Current]]></category> <category><![CDATA[David brewster]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dietrich von freiberg]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diffraction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electric charge]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electrical Resistance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electromagnetic Field]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Etienne-louis malus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Euclid]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Eye]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Faraday effect]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Faraday's law of induction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fermat's principle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[François jean dominique arago]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Francesco maria grimaldi]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Georg ohm]]></category> <category><![CDATA[George gabriel stokes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gian domenico romagnosi]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hanbury-brown and twiss effect]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hans christian ørsted]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Heinrich lenz]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Heinrich rudolf hertz]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hippolyte fizeau]]></category> <category><![CDATA[History of astronomical interferometry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Huygens' principle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ibn al-haytham]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ignace pardies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Infrared Radiation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Interference]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Interferometer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Isaac Newton]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Isaac newton's early life and achievements]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James bradley]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Clerk Maxwell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jean-bernard foucault]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Johann wilhelm ritter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Johannes Kepler]]></category> <category><![CDATA[John kerr]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Joseph priestley]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Joseph stefan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jupiter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kelvin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kilometre]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Laser]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lenz's law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Leonhard euler]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Light]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lightning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lord rayleigh]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Luigi galvani]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Magnet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Magnetic Field]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Magnetic monopole]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marko dominis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Martin ryle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Maser]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Maxwell's equations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Michael Faraday]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mount wilson observatory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Natural Satellite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ohm's law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ole rømer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opticks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pierre de fermat]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pierre de maricourt]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Polarization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ptolemy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Radio wave]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rainbow]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rayleigh scattering]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Reflection]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Refraction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[René descartes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Second]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Seneca the younger]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Simeon poisson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Snell's law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Special Relativity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Speed Of Light]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Stefan-boltzmann law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Stokes parameters]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Theodore maiman]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Thomas young]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Timeline]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Timeline of electromagnetism and classical optics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Timeline of electromagnetism and classical optics - introduction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Total internal reflection]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ultraviolet Radiation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Visual Perception]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Voltaic pile]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wave nature]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wilhelm conrad röntgen]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Willebrord van roijen snell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[William Herschel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[X Ray]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/timeline-of-electromagnetism-and-classical-optics-introduction</guid> <description><![CDATA[<a
href='http://www.contour2002.org/article/timeline-of-electromagnetism-and-classical-optics-introduction'><img
style='margin-right:10px;width:60px' src='http://d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/cc/Electromagnetism4-60x60.jpg' class='imgtfe' hspace='5' align='left' width='60' alt='Electromagnetism' title='Electromagnetism' border='0'/></a>Timeline of electromagnetism and classical optics *424 BC Aristophanes &#8220;lens&#8221; is a glass globe filled with water.(Seneca says that it can be used to read letters &#8221;no matter how small or dim&#8221;) *3rd century BC Euclid is the first to write about reflection and refraction and notes that light travels in straight lines * 130 [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding: 12px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p>Timeline of electromagnetism and classical optics</p><p>*424 BC Aristophanes &#8220;lens&#8221; is a glass globe filled with water.(Seneca says that it can be used to read letters &#8221;no matter how small or dim&#8221;)</p><p>*3rd century BC Euclid is the first to write about reflection and refraction and notes that light travels in straight lines</p><p>* 130 A.D. &mdash; Claudius Ptolemy (in his work &#8221;Optics&#8221;) wrote about the properties of light including: reflection, refraction, and color and tabulated angles of refraction for several media</p><p>* 1021 &mdash; Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen) writes the &#8221;Book of Optics&#8221;, studying vision.</p><p>* 1269 &mdash; Pierre de Maricourt describes magnetic poles and remarks on the nonexistence of isolated magnetic poles</p><p>* 1305 &mdash; Dietrich von Freiberg uses crystalline spheres and flasks filled with water to study the reflection and refraction in raindrops that leads to primary and secondary rainbows</p><p>* 1604 &mdash; Johannes Kepler describes how the eye focuses light</p><p>* 1604 &mdash; Johann Kepler specifies the laws of the rectilinear propagation of light</p><p>* 1611 &mdash; Marko Dominis discusses the rainbow in &#8221;De Radiis Visus et Lucis&#8221;</p><p>* 1611 &mdash; Johannes Kepler discovers total internal reflection, a small-angle refraction law, and thin lens optics,</p><p>* 1621 &mdash; Willebrord van Roijen Snell states his Snell&#8217;s law of refraction</p><p>* 1630 &mdash; Cabaeus finds that there are two types of electric charges</p><p>* 1637 &mdash; Ren&eacute; Descartes quantitatively<div
class="new_content"><a
href="http://d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/cc/Electromagnetism4.jpg"><img
src="http://d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/cc/Electromagnetism4.jpg" alt='Electromagnetism' /></a></div>derives the angles at which primary and secondary rainbows are seen with respect to the angle of the Sun&#8217;s elevation</p><p>* 1657 &mdash; Pierre de Fermat introduces the principle of least time into optics</p><p>* 1665 &mdash; Francesco Maria Grimaldi highlights the phenomenon of diffraction</p><p>* 1673 &mdash; Ignace Pardies provides a wave explanation for refraction of light</p><p>* 1675 &mdash; Isaac Newton delivers his theory of light</p><p>* 1676 &mdash; Olaus Roemer measures the speed of light by observing Jupiter&#8217;s moons</p><p>* 1678 &mdash; Christiaan Huygens states his principle of wavefront sources,</p><p>* 1704 &mdash; Isaac Newton publishes &#8221;Opticks&#8221;, a corpuscular theory of light and colour</p><p>* 1728 &mdash; James Bradley discovers the aberration of starlight and uses it to determine that the speed of light is about 283,000 km/s</p><p>* 1746 &mdash; Leonhard Euler develops the wave theory of light refraction and dispersion</p><p>* 1752 &mdash; Benjamin Franklin shows that lightning is electricity,</p><p>* 1767 &mdash; Joseph Priestley proposes an electrical inverse-square law</p><p>* 1785 &mdash; Charles Coulomb introduces the inverse-square law of electrostatics</p><p>* 1786 &mdash; Luigi Galvani discovers &#8220;animal electricity&#8221; and postulates that animal bodies are storehouses of electricity,</p><p>* 1800 &mdash; William Herschel discovers infrared radiation from the Sun</p><p>* 1801 &mdash; Johann Ritter discovers ultraviolet radiation from the Sun</p><p>* 1801 &mdash; Thomas Young demonstrates the wave nature of light and the principle of interference</p><p>* 1802 &mdash; Gian Domenico Romagnosi notes that a nearby voltaic pile deflects a magnetic needle. His account is largely overlooked.</p><p>* 1808 &mdash; Etienne-Louis Malus discovers polarization by reflection</p><p>* 1809 &mdash; Etienne-Louis Malus publishes the law of Malus which predicts the light intensity transmitted by two polarizing sheets</p><p>* 1811 &mdash; Fran&ccedil;ois Jean Dominique Arago discovers that some quartz crystals continuously rotate the electric vector of light</p><p>* 1816 &mdash; David Brewster discovers stress birefringence</p><p>* 1818 &mdash; Simeon Poisson predicts the Poisson-Arago bright spot at the center of the shadow of a circular opaque obstacle</p><p>* 1818 &mdash; Fran&ccedil;ois Jean Dominique Arago verifies the existence of the Poisson-Arago bright spot</p><p>* 1820 &mdash; Hans Christian &Oslash;rsted notices that a current in a wire can deflect a compass needle</p><p>* 1825 &mdash; Augustin Fresnel phenomenologically explains optical activity by introducing circular birefringence</p><p>* 1826 &mdash; Georg Simon Ohm states his Ohm&#8217;s law of electrical resistance</p><p>* 1831 &mdash; Michael Faraday states his law of induction</p><p>* 1833 &mdash; Heinrich Lenz states that an induced current in a closed conducting loop will appear in such a direction that it opposes the change that produced it (Lenz&#8217;s law)</p><p>* 1845 &mdash; Michael Faraday discovers that light propagation in a material can be influenced by external magnetic fields (Faraday effect)</p><p>* 1849 &mdash; Hippolyte Fizeau and Jean-Bernard Foucault measure the speed of light to be about 298,000&amp; km/s</p><p>* 1852 &mdash; George Gabriel Stokes defines the Stokes parameters of polarization</p><p>* 1864 &mdash; James Clerk Maxwell publishes his papers on a dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field</p><p>* 1871 &mdash; Lord Rayleigh discusses the blue sky law and sunsets (Rayleigh scattering)</p><p>* 1873 &mdash; James Clerk Maxwell states that light is an electromagnetic phenomenon</p><p>* 1875 &mdash; John Kerr discovers the electrically induced birefringence of some liquids</p><p>* 1879 &mdash; Jo&#382;ef Stefan discovers the Stefan-Boltzmann radiation law of a black body and uses it to calculate the first sensible value of the temperature of the Sun&#8217;s surface to be 5700 K</p><p>* 1888 &mdash; Heinrich Rudolf Hertz discovers radio waves</p><p>* 1895 &mdash; Wilhelm Conrad R&ouml;ntgen discovers X-rays</p><p>* 1896 &mdash; Arnold Sommerfeld solves the half-plane diffraction problem</p><p>* 1905 &mdash; Albert Einstein demonstrates that Maxwell&#8217;s Equations are not required to describe electromagnetic radiation if Special Relativity is taken into account</p><p>* 1919 &mdash; Albert Michelson makes the first interferometric measurements of stellar diameters at Mount Wilson Observatory (see history of astronomical interferometry)</p><p>* 1946 &mdash; Martin Ryle and Vonberg build the first two-element astronomical radio interferometer (see history of astronomical interferometry)</p><p>* 1953 &mdash; Charles H. Townes, James P. Gordon, and Herbert J. Zeiger produce the first maser</p><p>* 1956 &mdash; R. Hanbury-Brown and R.Q. Twiss complete the correlation interferometer</p><p>* 1960 &mdash; Theodore Maiman produces the first working laser</p><p>* 1999 &mdash; M. Henny and others demonstrate the Fermionic Hanbury Brown and Twiss Experiment</p><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article Timeline of electromagnetism and classical optics, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/timeline-of-electromagnetism-and-classical-optics-introduction/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>X-ray crystallography &#8211; History</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/x-ray-crystallography-history</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/x-ray-crystallography-history#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 14:52:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Crystallography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ångström]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert hull]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Anatase]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Angström]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arnold sommerfeld]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arthur compton]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arthur moritz schönflies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Auguste bravais]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bragg's law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bravais lattice]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Brucite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Calcite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Calcium fluoride]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Carbon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Charles glover barkla]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Copper]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Copper(ii) sulfate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Covalent bond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[David Rittenhouse]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Destructive interference]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diamond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diamond cubic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diffraction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diffraction grating]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diffraction pattern]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Elastic scattering]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electromagnetic Radiation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Englischer garten]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Francesco maria grimaldi]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Graphite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hydrogen bond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ionic compound]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Clerk Maxwell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James gregory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Johann hessel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Johannes Kepler]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Joseph von fraunhofer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Light]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mass]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Max von laue]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Miller index]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Molecule]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Munich]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nicolas steno]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nobel prize in physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Paul peter ewald]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Paul scherrer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Peter debye]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Photographic plate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Photon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Polarization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Polymorphism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Powder diffraction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pyrite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pyrochroite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ralph walter graystone wyckoff]]></category> <category><![CDATA[René just haüy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rutile]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Silicon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Snow]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sodium chloride]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sodium nitrate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Spectral line]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Spinel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tetrahedron]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Thomson scattering]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Titanium dioxide]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tridymite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Unit cell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Visible Light]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wavelength]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wilhelm conrad röntgen]]></category> <category><![CDATA[William barlow]]></category> <category><![CDATA[William hallowes miller]]></category> <category><![CDATA[William henry bragg]]></category> <category><![CDATA[William lawrence bragg]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wurtzite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[X Ray]]></category> <category><![CDATA[X Ray Diffraction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[X-ray crystallography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[X-ray crystallography - history]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Yevgraf fyodorov]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/x-ray-crystallography-history</guid> <description><![CDATA[<a
href='http://www.contour2002.org/article/x-ray-crystallography-history'><img
style='margin-right:10px;width:60px' src='http://d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/cc/Crystallography4-60x60.jpg' class='imgtfe' hspace='5' align='left' width='60' alt='Crystallography' title='Crystallography' border='0'/></a>Early scientific history of crystals and X-rays X-rays were discovered by Wilhelm Conrad R&#246;ntgen in 1895, just as the studies of crystal symmetry were being concluded. Physicists were initially uncertain of the nature of X-rays, although it was soon suspected (correctly) that they were waves of electromagnetic radiation, in other words, another form of light. [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding: 12px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><h3>Early scientific history of crystals and X-rays</h3><p>X-rays were discovered by Wilhelm Conrad R&ouml;ntgen in 1895, just as the studies of crystal symmetry were being concluded. Physicists were initially uncertain of the nature of X-rays, although it was soon suspected (correctly) that they were waves of electromagnetic radiation, in other words, another form of light. At that time, the wave model of light &mdash; specifically, the Maxwell theory of electromagnetic radiation &mdash; was well accepted among scientists, and experiments by Charles Glover Barkla showed that X-rays exhibited phenomena associated with electromagnetic waves, including transverse polarization and spectral lines akin to those observed in the visible wavelengths. Single-slit experiments in the laboratory of Arnold Sommerfeld suggested the wavelength of X-rays was about 1 Angstr&ouml;m. However, X-rays are composed of photons, and thus are not only waves of electromagnetic radiation but also exhibit particle-like properties. The photon concept was introduced by Albert Einstein in 1905, but it was not broadly accepted until 1922, when Arthur Compton confirmed it by the scattering of X-rays from electrons. Therefore, these particle-like properties of X-rays, such as their ionization of gases, caused William Henry Bragg to argue in 1907 that X-rays were &#8221;not&#8221; electromagnetic radiation. Nevertheless, Bragg&#8217;s view was not broadly accepted and the observation of X-ray diffraction in 1912 confirmed for most scientists that X-rays were a form of electromagnetic radiation.</p><h3>X-ray analysis of crystals</<div
class="new_content"><a
href="http://d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/cc/Crystallography4.jpg"><img
src="http://d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/cc/Crystallography4.jpg" alt='Crystallography' /></a></div>h3><p>Crystals are regular arrays of atoms, and X-rays can be considered waves of electromagnetic radiation. Atoms scatter X-ray waves, primarily through the atoms&#8217; electrons. Just as an ocean wave striking a lighthouse produces secondary circular waves emanating from the lighthouse, so an X-ray striking an electron produces secondary spherical waves emanating from the electron. This phenomenon is known as elastic scattering, and the electron (or lighthouse) is known as the &#8221;scatterer&#8221;. A regular array of scatterers produces a regular array of spherical waves. Although these waves cancel one another out in most directions through destructive interference, they add constructively in a few specific directions, determined by Bragg&#8217;s law:</p><p>:2d sin theta = n lambda!</p><p>Here &#8221;d&#8221; is the spacing between diffracting planes, theta is the incident angle, &#8221;n&#8221; is any integer, and &lambda; is the wavelength of the beam. These specific directions appear as spots on the diffraction pattern called &#8221;reflections&#8221;. Thus, X-ray diffraction results from an electromagnetic wave (the X-ray) impinging on a regular array of scatterers (the repeating arrangement of atoms within the crystal).</p><p>X-rays are used to produce the diffraction pattern because their wavelength &lambda; is typically the same order of magnitude (1-100 &Aring;ngstr&ouml;ms) as the spacing &#8221;d&#8221; between planes in the crystal. In principle, any wave impinging on a regular array of scatterers produces diffraction, as predicted first by Francesco Maria Grimaldi in 1665. To produce significant diffraction, the spacing between the scatterers and the wavelength of the impinging wave should be similar in size. For illustration, the diffraction of sunlight through a bird&#8217;s feather was first reported by James Gregory in the later 17th century. The first artificial diffraction gratings for visible light were constructed by David Rittenhouse in 1787, and Joseph von Fraunhofer in 1821. However, visible light has too long a wavelength (typically, 5500 &Aring;ngstr&ouml;ms) to observe diffraction from crystals. Prior to the first X-ray diffraction experiments, the spacings between lattice planes in a crystal were not known with certainty.</p><p>The idea that crystals could be used as a diffraction grating for X-rays arose in 1912 in a conversation between Paul Peter Ewald and Max von Laue in the English Garden in Munich. Ewald had proposed a resonator model of crystals for his thesis, but this model could not be validated using visible light, since the wavelength was much larger than the spacing between the resonators. Von Laue realized that electromagnetic radiation of a shorter wavelength was needed to observe such small spacings, and suggested that X-rays might have a wavelength comparable to the unit-cell spacing in crystals. Von Laue worked with two technicians, Walter Friedrich and his assistant Paul Knipping, to shine a beam of X-rays through a copper sulfate crystal and record its diffraction on a photographic plate. After being developed, the plate showed a large number of well-defined spots arranged in a pattern of intersecting circles around the spot produced by the central beam. Von Laue developed a law that connects the scattering angles and the size and orientation of the unit-cell spacings in the crystal, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1914.</p><p>As described in the mathematical derivation below, the X-ray scattering is determined by the density of electrons within the crystal. Since the energy of an X-ray is much greater than that of a valence electron, the scattering may be modeled as Thomson scattering, the interaction of an electromagnetic ray with a free electron. This model is generally adopted to describe the polarization of the scattered radiation. The intensity of Thomson scattering declines as 1/&#8221;m&#8221;&amp;sup2; with the mass &#8221;m&#8221; of the charged particle that is scattering the radiation; hence, the atomic nuclei, which are thousands of times heavier than an electron, contribute negligibly to the scattered X-rays.</p><h3>Development from 1912 to 1920</h3><p> After Von Laue&#8217;s pioneering research, the field developed rapidly, most notably by physicists William Lawrence Bragg and his father William Henry Bragg. In 1912-1913, the younger Bragg developed Bragg&#8217;s law, which connects the observed scattering with reflections from evenly spaced planes within the crystal. The Braggs, father and son, shared the 1915 Nobel Prize in Physics for their work in crystallography. The earliest structures were generally simple and marked by one-dimensional symmetry. However, as computational and experimental methods improved over the next decades, it became feasible to deduce reliable atomic positions for more complicated two- and three-dimensional arrangements of atoms in the unit-cell.</p><p>The potential of X-ray crystallography for determining the structure of molecules and minerals &mdash; then only known vaguely from chemical and hydrodynamic experiments &mdash; was realized immediately. The earliest structures were simple inorganic crystals and minerals, but even these revealed fundamental laws of physics and chemistry. The first atomic-resolution structure to be &#8220;solved&#8221; (i.e. determined) in 1914 was that of table salt. The distribution of electrons in the table-salt structure showed that crystals are not necessarily composed of covalently bonded molecules, and proved the existence of ionic compounds. The structure of diamond was solved in the same year, proving the tetrahedral arrangement of its chemical bonds and showing that the length of C&ndash;C single bond was 1.52 &Aring;ngstr&ouml;ms. Other early structures included copper, calcium fluoride (CaF2, also known as &#8221;fluorite&#8221;), calcite (CaCO3) and pyrite (FeS2) in 1914; spinel (MgAl2O4) in 1915; the rutile and anatase forms of titanium dioxide (TiO2) in 1916; pyrochroite Mn(OH)2 and, by extension, brucite Mg(OH)2 in 1919;. Also in 1919 sodium nitrate (NaNO3) and cesium dichloroiodide (CsICl2) were determined by Ralph Walter Graystone Wyckoff, and the wurtzite (hexagonal ZnS) structure became known in 1920.</p><p>The structure of graphite was solved in 1916 by the related method of powder diffraction, which was developed by Peter Debye and Paul Scherrer and, independently, by Albert Hull in 1917. The structure of graphite was determined from single-crystal diffraction in 1924 by two groups independently. Hull also used the powder method to determine the structures of various metals, such as iron and magnesium.</p><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article X-ray crystallography, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/x-ray-crystallography-history/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Physics &#8211; Research fields</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/physics-research-fields</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/physics-research-fields#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:49:19 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[High-energy Astrophysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[American physical society]]></category> <category><![CDATA[And optical physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Antiferromagnet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astrophysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Atomic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Atomic Nucleus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Atomic physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Big Bang]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Big bang nucleosynthesis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biophysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bose–einstein condensate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cern]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Classical Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Collision]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Condensed matter physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conduction electron]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cosmic inflation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cosmic Microwave Background]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cosmological principle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Crystal Lattice]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dark Energy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dark Matter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Edwin Hubble]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electromagnetic Force]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electromagnetism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electron]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Elementary particle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Energetic neutral atom]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fermi gamma-ray space telescope]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fermilab]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ferromagnet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Force Carrier]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fundamental force]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gamma-ray astronomy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gluon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Heliosphere]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Higgs boson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[High energy physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hubble diagram]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hubble ultra deep field]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hyperfine splitting]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ibex]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Infrared Astronomy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Interactions]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Karl jansky]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lambda-cdm model]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Large hadron collider]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lepton]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lev landau]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Light]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Liquid]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Materials Science]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Matter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Molecular]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Molecular physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Molecule]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nuclear fission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nuclear Fusion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Optical field]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Optical physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Particle Accelerator]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Particle Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Phase]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Philip warren anderson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Photon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physical Cosmology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physics - research fields]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physics education]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quantum Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quark]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Radio astronomy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rubidium]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solar System]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solar Wind]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solid-state physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Specialization of knowledge]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Spin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standard Model]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Steady state]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Stellar evolution]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Stellar structure]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strong nuclear force]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Superconductivity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Superfluid]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Temperature]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Termination shock]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tevatron]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ultraviolet astronomy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[W and z bosons]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Weak nuclear force]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Weakly interacting massive particle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[X-ray astronomy]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/physics-research-fields</guid> <description><![CDATA[<a
href='http://www.contour2002.org/article/physics-research-fields'><img
style='margin-right:10px;width:60px' src='http://d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/cc/High-energy_Astrophysics-60x60.jpg' class='imgtfe' hspace='5' align='left' width='60' alt='High-energy Astrophysics' title='High-energy Astrophysics' border='0'/></a>Contemporary research in physics can be broadly divided into condensed matter physics; atomic, molecular, and optical physics; particle physics; astrophysics; geophysics and biophysics. Some physics departments also support research in Physics education. Since the twentieth century, the individual fields of physics have become increasingly specialized, and today most physicists work in a single field for [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding: 12px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p>Contemporary research in physics can be broadly divided into condensed matter physics; atomic, molecular, and optical physics; particle physics; astrophysics; geophysics and biophysics. Some physics departments also support research in Physics education.</p><p>Since the twentieth century, the individual fields of physics have become increasingly specialized, and today most physicists work in a single field for their entire careers. &#8220;Universalists&#8221; such as Albert Einstein (1879&ndash;1955) and Lev Landau (1908&ndash;1968), who worked in multiple fields of physics, are now very rare.</p><h4>Condensed matter</h4><p>Condensed matter physics is the field of physics that deals with the macroscopic physical properties of matter. In particular, it is concerned with the &#8220;condensed&#8221; phases that appear whenever the number of constituents in a system is extremely large and the interactions between the constituents are strong.</p><p>The most familiar examples of condensed phases are solids and liquids, which arise from the bonding and electromagnetic force between atoms. More exotic condensed phases include the superfluid and the Bose&ndash;Einstein condensate found in certain atomic systems at very low temperature, the superconducting phase exhibited by conduction electrons in certain materials, and the ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases of spins on atomic lattices.</p><p>Condensed matter physics is by far the largest field of contemporary physics. Historically, condensed matter physics grew out of solid-state physics, which is now considered one of its main subfields.<div
class="new_content"><a
href="http://d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/cc/High-energy_Astrophysics.jpg"><img
src="http://d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/cc/High-energy_Astrophysics.jpg" alt='High-energy Astrophysics' /></a></div>The term &#8221;condensed matter physics&#8221; was apparently coined by Philip Anderson when he renamed his research group &mdash; previously &#8221;solid-state theory&#8221; &mdash; in 1967.</p><p>In 1978, the Division of Solid State Physics at the American Physical Society was renamed as the Division of Condensed Matter Physics. Condensed matter physics has a large overlap with chemistry, materials science, nanotechnology and engineering.</p><h4>Atomic, molecular, and optical physics</h4><p>Atomic, molecular, and optical physics (AMO) is the study of matter-matter and light-matter interactions on the scale of single atoms or structures containing a few atoms. The three areas are grouped together because of their interrelationships, the similarity of methods used, and the commonality of the energy scales that are relevant. All three areas include both classical and quantum treatments; they can treat their subject from a microscopic view (in contrast to a macroscopic view).</p><p>Atomic physics studies the electron shells of atoms. Current research focuses on activities in quantum control, cooling and trapping of atoms and ions, low-temperature collision dynamics, the collective behavior of atoms in weakly interacting gases (Bose&ndash;Einstein Condensates and dilute Fermi degenerate systems), precision measurements of fundamental constants, and the effects of electron correlation on structure and dynamics. Atomic physics is influenced by the nucleus (see, e.g., hyperfine splitting), but intra-nuclear phenomenon such as fission and fusion are considered part of high energy physics.</p><p>Molecular physics focuses on multi-atomic structures and their internal and external interactions with matter and light. Optical physics is distinct from optics in that it tends to focus not on the control of classical light fields by macroscopic objects, but on the fundamental properties of optical fields and their interactions with matter in the microscopic realm.</p><h4>High energy/particle physics</h4><p>Particle physics is the study of the elementary constituents of matter and energy, and the interactions between them. It may also be called &#8220;high energy physics&#8221;, because many elementary particles do not occur naturally, but are created only during high energy collisions of other particles, as can be detected in particle accelerators.</p><p>Currently, the interactions of elementary particles are described by the Standard Model. The model accounts for the 12 known particles of matter (quarks and leptons) that interact via the strong, weak, and electromagnetic fundamental forces. Dynamics are described in terms of matter particles exchanging force carrier particles (gluons, W and Z bosons, and photons, respectively). The Standard Model also predicts a particle known as the Higgs boson, the existence of which has not yet been verified; , searches for it are underway in the Tevatron at Fermilab and in the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.</p><h4>Astrophysics</h4><p>Astrophysics and astronomy are the application of the theories and methods of physics to the study of stellar structure, stellar evolution, the origin of the solar system, and related problems of cosmology. Because astrophysics is a broad subject, astrophysicists typically apply many disciplines of physics, including mechanics, electromagnetism, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, relativity, nuclear and particle physics, and atomic and molecular physics.</p><p>The discovery by Karl Jansky in 1931 that radio signals were emitted by celestial bodies initiated the science of radio astronomy. Most recently, the frontiers of astronomy have been expanded by space exploration. Perturbations and interference from the earth&rsquo;s atmosphere make space-based observations necessary for infrared, ultraviolet, gamma-ray, and X-ray astronomy.</p><p>Physical cosmology is the study of the formation and evolution of the universe on its largest scales. Albert Einstein&rsquo;s theory of relativity plays a central role in all modern cosmological theories. In the early 20th century, Hubble&#8217;s discovery that the universe was expanding, as shown by the Hubble diagram, prompted rival explanations known as the steady state universe and the Big Bang.</p><p>The Big Bang was confirmed by the success of Big Bang nucleosynthesis and the discovery of the cosmic microwave background in 1964. The Big Bang model rests on two theoretical pillars: Albert Einstein&#8217;s general relativity and the cosmological principle. Cosmologists have recently established the &Lambda;CDM model of the evolution of the universe, which includes cosmic inflation, dark energy and dark matter.</p><p>Numerous possibilities and discoveries are anticipated to emerge from new data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope over the upcoming decade and vastly revise or clarify existing models of the Universe. In particular, the potential for a tremendous discovery surrounding dark matter is possible over the next several years. Fermi will search for evidence that dark matter is composed of weakly interacting massive particles, complementing similar experiments with the Large Hadron Collider and other underground detectors.</p><p>IBEX is already yielding new astrophysical discoveries: &#8220;No one knows what is creating the ENA ribbon&#8221; along the termination shock of the solar wind, &#8220;but everyone agrees that it means the textbook picture of the heliosphere &mdash; in which the solar system&#8217;s enveloping pocket filled with the solar wind&#8217;s charged particles is plowing through the onrushing &#8216;galactic wind&#8217; of the interstellar medium in the shape of a comet &mdash; is wrong.&#8221;</p><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article Physics, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/physics-research-fields/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Relativistic electromagnetism &#8211; Einstein&#8217;s motivation</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/relativistic-electromagnetism-einsteins-motivation</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/relativistic-electromagnetism-einsteins-motivation#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 02:53:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Electromagnetism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[American journal of physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Michaelson–morley experiment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Relativistic electromagnetism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Relativistic electromagnetism - einstein’s motivation]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/relativistic-electromagnetism-einsteins-motivation</guid> <description><![CDATA[In 1953 Albert Einstein wrote to the Cleveland Physics Society on the occasion of a commemoration of the Michaelson&#8211;Morley experiment. In that letter he wrote: : What led me more or less directly to the special theory of relativity was the conviction that the electromotive force acting on a body in motion in a magnetic [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding:0 15px 15px 15px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p>In 1953 Albert Einstein wrote to the Cleveland Physics Society on the occasion of a commemoration of the Michaelson&ndash;Morley experiment. In that letter he wrote:</p><p>: What led me more or less directly to the special theory of relativity was the conviction that the electromotive force acting on a body in motion in a magnetic field was nothing else but an electric field.</p><p>This sentence is included in the letter, which is appended to R.S. Shankland&rsquo;s 1964 article on the experiment in American Journal of Physics 32:35. It is also quoted by Anthony French (1968) in his presentation of relativistic electromagnetism. This statement by Einstein reveals that he investigated spacetime symmetries to determine the complementarity of electric and magnetic forces.</p><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article Relativistic electromagnetism, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/relativistic-electromagnetism-einsteins-motivation/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Nuclear physics &#8211; History</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/nuclear-physics-history</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/nuclear-physics-history#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:52:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Nuclear Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Alpha decay]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Beta decay]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Binding energy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[California institute of technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conservation of energy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dmitri ivanenko]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electron]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Enrico Fermi]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ernest marsden]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ernest rutherford]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fermi's interaction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Frédéric joliot-curie]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Franco rasetti]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gamma decay]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Geiger-marsden experiment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gold]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hans geiger]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Henri becquerel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Herbert l. becker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hideki yukawa]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Irène joliot-curie]]></category> <category><![CDATA[J. j. thomson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James chadwick]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lise meitner]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mass–energy equivalence]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Meson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Neutron]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nuclear physics - history]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nucleon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Otto hahn]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Particle Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pi meson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Plum pudding model]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Positron]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Radiation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Spectrum]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Spin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standard Model]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strong Force]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virtual particle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Walther bothe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Yukawa interaction]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/nuclear-physics-history</guid> <description><![CDATA[The discovery of the electron by J. J. Thomson was the first indication that the atom had internal structure. At the turn of the 20th century the accepted model of the atom was J. J. Thomson&#8217;s &#8220;plum pudding&#8221; model in which the atom was a large positively charged ball with small negatively charged electrons embedded [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding:0 15px 15px 15px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p>The discovery of the electron by J. J. Thomson was the first indication that the atom had internal structure. At the turn of the 20th century the accepted model of the atom was J. J. Thomson&#8217;s &#8220;plum pudding&#8221; model in which the atom was a large positively charged ball with small negatively charged electrons embedded inside of it. By the turn of the century physicists had also discovered three types of radiation coming from atoms, which they named alpha, beta, and gamma radiation. Experiments in 1911 by Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn, and by James Chadwick in 1914 discovered that the beta decay spectrum was continuous rather than discrete. That is, electrons were ejected from the atom with a range of energies, rather than the discrete amounts of energies that were observed in gamma and alpha decays. This was a problem for nuclear physics at the time, because it indicated that energy was not conserved in these decays.</p><p>In 1905, Albert Einstein formulated the idea of mass&ndash;energy equivalence. While the work on radioactivity by Becquerel, Pierre and Marie Curie predates this, an explanation of the source of the energy of radioactivity would have to wait for the discovery that the nucleus itself was composed of smaller constituents, the nucleons.</p><h3> Rutherford&#8217;s team discovers the nucleus</h3><p> In 1907 Ernest Rutherford published &#8220;Radiation of the &alpha; Particle from Radium in passing through Matter&#8221;. Geiger expanded on this work in a communication to the Royal Society with experiments he and Rutherford had done passing &alpha; particles through air, aluminum foil and gold leaf. More work was published in 1909 by Geiger and Marsden and further greatly expanded work was published in 1910 by Geiger, In 1911-2 Rutherford went before the Royal Society to explain the experiments and propound the new theory of the atomic nucleus as we now understand it.</p><p>The key experiment behind this announcement happened in 1910 as Ernest Rutherford&#8217;s team performed a remarkable experiment in which Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden under his supervision fired alpha particles (helium nuclei) at a thin film of gold foil. The plum pudding model predicted that the alpha particles should come out of the foil with their trajectories being at most slightly bent. Rutherford had the idea to instruct his team to look for something that shocked him to actually observe: a few particles were scattered through large angles, even completely backwards, in some cases. He likened it to firing a bullet at tissue paper and having it bounce off. The discovery, beginning with Rutherford&#8217;s analysis of the data in 1911, eventually led to the Rutherford model of the atom, in which the atom has a very small, very dense nucleus containing most of its mass, and consisting of heavy positively charged particles with embedded electrons in order to balance out the charge (since the neutron was unknown). As an example, in this model (which is not the modern one) nitrogen-14 consisted of a nucleus with 14 protons and 7 electrons (21 total particles), and the nucleus was surrounded by 7 more orbiting electrons.</p><p>The Rutherford model worked quite well until studies of nuclear spin were carried out by Franco Rasetti at the California Institute of Technology in 1929. By 1925 it was known that protons and electrons had a spin of 1/2, and in the Rutherford model of nitrogen-14, 20 of the total 21 nuclear particles should have paired up to cancel each other&#8217;s spin, and the final odd particle should have left the nucleus with a net spin of 1/2. Rasetti discovered, however, that nitrogen-14 has a spin of 1.</p><h3> James Chadwick discovers the neutron</h3><p> In 1932 Chadwick realized that radiation that had been observed by Walther Bothe, Herbert L. Becker, Ir&egrave;ne and Fr&eacute;d&eacute;ric Joliot-Curie was actually due to a neutral particle of about the same mass as the proton, that he called the neutron (following a suggestion about the need for such a particle, by Rutherford). In the same year Dmitri Ivanenko suggested that neutrons were in fact spin 1/2 particles and that the nucleus contained neutrons to explain the mass not due to protons, and that there were no electrons in the nucleus&mdash;only protons and neutrons. The neutron spin immediately solved the problem of the spin of nitrogen-14, as the one unpaired proton and one unpaired neutron in this model, each contribute a spin of 1/2 in the same direction, for a final total spin of 1.</p><p>With the discovery of the neutron, scientists at last could calculate what fraction of binding energy each nucleus had, from comparing the nuclear mass with that of the protons and neutrons which composed it. Differences between nuclear masses were calculated in this way and&mdash;when nuclear reactions were measured&mdash;were found to agree with Einstein&#8217;s calculation of the equivalence of mass and energy to high accuracy (within 1% as of in 1934).</p><h3> Yukawa&#8217;s meson postulated to bind nuclei</h3><p> In 1935 Hideki Yukawa proposed the first significant theory of the strong force to explain how the nucleus holds together. In the Yukawa interaction a virtual particle, later called a meson, mediated a force between all nucleons, including protons and neutrons. This force explained why nuclei did not disintegrate under the influence of proton repulsion, and it also gave an explanation of why the attractive strong force had a more limited range than the electromagnetic repulsion between protons. Later, the discovery of the pi meson showed it to have the properties of Yukawa&#8217;s particle.</p><p>With Yukawa&#8217;s papers, the modern model of the atom was complete. The center of the atom contains a tight ball of neutrons and protons, which is held together by the strong nuclear force, unless it is too large. Unstable nuclei may undergo alpha decay, in which they emit an energetic helium nucleus, or beta decay, in which they eject an electron (or positron). After one of these decays the resultant nucleus may be left in an excited state, and in this case it decays to its ground state by emitting high energy photons (gamma decay).</p><p>The study of the strong and weak nuclear forces (the latter explained by Enrico Fermi via Fermi&#8217;s interaction in 1934) led physicists to collide nuclei and electrons at ever higher energies. This research became the science of particle physics, the crown jewel of which is the standard model of particle physics which unifies the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces.</p><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article Nuclear physics, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/nuclear-physics-history/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cosmology &#8211; Physical cosmology</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/cosmology-physical-cosmology</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/cosmology-physical-cosmology#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:50:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Andromeda galaxy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Aristarchus of samos]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arno penzias]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arthur eddington]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Big Bang]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Celestial Mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Celestial sphere]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cobe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Copernican principle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cosmic inflation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cosmic microwave background radiation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cosmogony]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cosmological Constant]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cosmology - physical cosmology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Edwin Hubble]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Epistemological rupture]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Expanding Universe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Galileo Galilei]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General relativity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Geocentric]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Georges lemaître]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Harlow shapley]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Heber d. curtis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Heliocentric]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Isaac Newton]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Johannes Kepler]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Karl schwarzschild]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kepler's laws]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law of universal gravitation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Milky Way]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nicolaus copernicus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Non-standard cosmology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physical law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ptolemaic system]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ptolemy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Redshift]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Robert woodrow wilson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The great debate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Willem de sitter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wmap]]></category> <category><![CDATA[World war i]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/cosmology-physical-cosmology</guid> <description><![CDATA[Physical cosmology is the branch of physics and astrophysics that deals with the study of the physical origins and evolution of the Universe. It also includes the study of the nature of the Universe on its very largest scales. In its earliest form it was what is now known as celestial mechanics, the study of [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding:0 15px 15px 15px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p>Physical cosmology is the branch of physics and astrophysics that deals with the study of the physical origins and evolution of the Universe. It also includes the study of the nature of the Universe on its very largest scales. In its earliest form it was what is now known as celestial mechanics, the study of the heavens. The Greek philosophers Aristarchus of Samos, Aristotle and Ptolemy proposed different cosmological theories. In particular, the geocentric Ptolemaic system was the accepted theory to explain the motion of the heavens until Nicolaus Copernicus, and subsequently Johannes Kepler and Galileo Galilei proposed a heliocentric system in the 16th century. This is known as one of the most famous examples of epistemological rupture in physical cosmology.</p><p>With Isaac Newton and the 1687 publication of &#8221;Principia Mathematica&#8221;, the problem of the motion of the heavens was finally solved. Newton provided a physical mechanism for Kepler&#8217;s laws and his law of universal gravitation allowed the anomalies in previous systems, caused by gravitational interaction between the planets, to be resolved. A fundamental difference between Newton&#8217;s cosmology and those preceding it was the Copernican principle that the bodies on earth obey the same physical laws as all the celestial bodies. This was a crucial philosophical advance in physical cosmology.</p><p>Modern scientific cosmology is usually considered to have begun in 1917 with Albert Einstein&#8217;s publication of his final modification of general relativity in the paper &#8220;Cosmological Considerations of the General Theory of Relativity,&#8221; (although this paper was not widely available outside of Germany until the end of World War I). General relativity prompted cosmogonists such as Willem de Sitter, Karl Schwarzschild and Arthur Eddington to explore the astronomical consequences of the theory, which enhanced the growing ability of astronomers to study very distant objects. Prior to this (and for some time afterwards), physicists assumed that the Universe was static and unchanging. In parallel to this dynamic approach to cosmology, a debate was unfolding regarding the nature of the cosmos itself. On the one hand, Mount Wilson astronomer Harlow Shapley championed the model of a cosmos made up of the Milky Way star system only. Heber D. Curtis, on the other hand, suggested spiral nebulae were star systems in their own right, island universes. This difference of ideas came to a climax with the organization of the Great Debate at the meeting of the (US) National Academy of Sciences in Washington on 26 April 1920. The resolution of the debate on the structure of the cosmos came with the detection of novae in the Andromeda galaxy by Edwin Hubble in 1923 and 1924. Their distance established spiral nebulae well beyond the edge of the Milky Way and has galaxies of their own. Subsequent modeling of the universe explored the possibility that the cosmological constant introduced by Einstein in his 1917 paper may result in an expanding universe, depending on its value. Thus the big bang model was proposed by the Belgian priest Georges Lema&icirc;tre in 1927 which was subsequently corroborated by Edwin Hubble&#8217;s discovery of the red shift in 1929 and later by the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation by Arno Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson in 1964. These findings were a first step to rule out some of many alternative physical cosmologies.</p><p>Recent observations made by the COBE and WMAP satellites observing this background radiation have effectively, in many scientists&#8217; eyes, transformed cosmology from a highly speculative science into a predictive science, as these observations matched predictions made by a theory called Cosmic inflation, which is a modification of the standard big bang model. This has led many to refer to modern times as the &#8220;Golden age of cosmology.&#8221;</p><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article Cosmology, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/cosmology-physical-cosmology/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Physical cosmology &#8211; Introduction</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/physical-cosmology-introduction</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/physical-cosmology-introduction#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:50:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Physical Cosmology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astrophysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Big Bang Theory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Copernican principle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General relativity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Newtonian mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Non-standard cosmology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Origin Of The Universe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Particle Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Particle physics phenomenology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physical cosmology - introduction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physical law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Plasma Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Science]]></category> <category><![CDATA[String Theory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/physical-cosmology-introduction</guid> <description><![CDATA[Physical cosmology, as a branch of astronomy, is the study of the largest-scale structures and dynamics of the universe and is concerned with fundamental questions about its formation and evolution. For most of human history, it was a branch of metaphysics and religion. Cosmology as a science originated with the Copernican principle, which implies that [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding:0 15px 15px 15px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p>Physical cosmology, as a branch of astronomy, is the study of the largest-scale structures and dynamics of the universe and is concerned with fundamental questions about its formation and evolution. For most of human history, it was a branch of metaphysics and religion. Cosmology as a science originated with the Copernican principle, which implies that celestial bodies obey identical physical laws to those on Earth, and Newtonian mechanics, which first allowed us to understand those laws.</p><p>Physical cosmology, as it is now understood, began with the twentieth century development of Albert Einstein&#8217;s general theory of relativity and better astronomical observations of extremely distant objects. These advances made it possible to speculate about the origin of the universe, and allowed scientists to establish the Big Bang Theory as the leading cosmological model. Some researchers still advocate a handful of alternative cosmologies; however, cosmologists generally agree that the Big Bang theory best explains observations.</p><p>Cosmology draws heavily on the work of many disparate areas of research in physics. Areas relevant to cosmology include particle physics experiments and theory, including string theory, astrophysics, general relativity, and plasma physics. Thus, cosmology unites the physics of the largest structures in the universe with the physics of the smallest structures in the universe.</p><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article Physical cosmology, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/physical-cosmology-introduction/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Natural science &#8211; Branches of natural science</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/natural-science-branches-of-natural-science</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/natural-science-branches-of-natural-science#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 14:49:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Natural Science]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Alchemy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Antoine Lavoisier]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Apollo 11]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Applied physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astrobiology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astrochemistry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astronomical object]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astrophysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Atomic Theory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Behaviors]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biochemistry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biodiversity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biophysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Botany]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Caffeine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Celestial Mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cellular Biology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Characteristic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Charles Darwin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chemical bond]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chemical industry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chemical physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chemical Reaction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Classical Mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Comet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Complex system]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conservation of mass]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cosmos]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Crystal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Daedalus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Developmental biology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Discoveries of the chemical elements]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dna]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Earths Atmosphere]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ecology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economic Geology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Environmental Science]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Far side of the moon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Force]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Forces]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Free body diagram]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Galaxy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Galileo Galilei]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gemology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General relativity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Geochemistry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Geology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Germ Theory Of Disease]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gravitation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hydrology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Informatics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Interstellar medium]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Isaac Newton]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Johannes Kepler]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Law of universal gravitation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lev landau]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Life]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Magnetism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marine Biology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marine ecosystem]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Metal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Meteorology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microbiology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mineral exploration]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mineralogy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mining]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Molecular Biology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Molecule]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Motion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nanoscience]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Natural science - branches of natural science]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Natural selection]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Oceanography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Organic molecule]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Organism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Palaeontology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Petroleum]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Phase]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Phenomena]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Phenomenon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physical Cosmology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physical geography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physical oceanography]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physiology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Planet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Plate tectonic]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quantum Mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Robert boyle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Scientific classification]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Soil Science]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solar System]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Special Relativity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Species]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Spectroscope]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Star]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Structural formula]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The central science]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Theoretical Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Thermodynamics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trajectory of a projectile]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Zoology]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/natural-science-branches-of-natural-science</guid> <description><![CDATA[Astronomy This discipline is the science of celestial objects and phenomena that originate outside the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere. It is concerned with the evolution, physics, chemistry, meteorology, and motion of celestial objects, as well as the formation and development of the universe. Astronomy includes the examination, study and modeling of stars, planets, comets, galaxies and the [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding:0 15px 15px 15px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><h3>Astronomy</h3><p> This discipline is the science of celestial objects and phenomena that originate outside the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere. It is concerned with the evolution, physics, chemistry, meteorology, and motion of celestial objects, as well as the formation and development of the universe.</p><p>Astronomy includes the examination, study and modeling of stars, planets, comets, galaxies and the cosmos. Most of the information used by astronomers is gathered by remote observation, although some laboratory reproduction of celestial phenomenon has been performed (such as the molecular chemistry of the interstellar medium).</p><p>While the origins of the study of celestial features and phenomenon can be traced back to antiquity, the scientific methodology of this field began to develop in the middle of the 17th century. A key factor was Galileo&#8217;s introduction of the telescope to examine the night sky in more detail.</p><p>The mathematical treatment of astronomy began with Newton&#8217;s development of celestial mechanics and the laws of gravitation, although it was triggered by earlier work of astronomers such as Kepler. By the 19th century, astronomy had developed into a formal science, with the introduction of instruments such as the spectroscope and photography, along with much-improved telescopes and the creation of professional observatories.</p><h3>Biology</h3><p> This field encompasses a set of disciplines that examines phenomena related to living organisms. The scale of study can range from sub-component biophysics up to complex ecologies. Biology is concerned with the characteristics, classification and behaviors of organisms, as well as how species were formed and their interactions with each other and the environment.</p><p>The biological fields of botany, zoology, and medicine date back to early periods of civilization, while microbiology was introduced in the 17th century with the invention of the microscope. However, it was not until the 19th century that biology became a unified science. Once scientists discovered commonalities between all living things, it was decided they were best studied as a whole.</p><p>Some key developments in biology were the discovery of genetics; Darwin&#8217;s theory of evolution through natural selection; the germ theory of disease and the application of the techniques of chemistry and physics at the level of the cell or organic molecule.</p><p>Modern biology is divided into subdisciplines by the type of organism and by the scale being studied. Molecular biology is the study of the fundamental chemistry of life, while cellular biology is the examination of the cell; the basic building block of all life. At a higher level, physiology looks at the internal structure of organism, while ecology looks at how various organisms interrelate.</p><h3>Chemistry</h3><p> Constituting the scientific study of matter at the atomic and molecular scale, chemistry deals primarily with collections of atoms, such as gases, molecules, crystals, and metals. The composition, statistical properties, transformations and reactions of these materials are studied. Chemistry also involves understanding the properties and interactions of individual atoms for use in larger-scale applications.</p><p>Most chemical processes can be studied directly in a laboratory, using a series of (often well-tested) techniques for manipulating materials, as well as an understanding of the underlying processes. Chemistry is often called &#8220;the central science&#8221; because of its role in connecting the other natural sciences.</p><p>Early experiments in chemistry had their roots in the system of Alchemy, a set of beliefs combining mysticism with physical experiments. The science of chemistry began to develop with the work of Robert Boyle, the discoverer of gas, and Antoine Lavoisier, who developed the theory of the Conservation of mass.</p><p>The discovery of the chemical elements and the concept of Atomic Theory began to systematize this science, and researchers developed a fundamental understanding of states of matter, ions, chemical bonds and chemical reactions. The success of this science led to a complementary chemical industry that now plays a significant role in the world economy.</p><h3>Earth science</h3><p> Earth science (also known as geoscience, the geosciences or the Earth Sciences), is an all-embracing term for the sciences related to the planet Earth, including geology, geophysics, hydrology, meteorology, physical geography, oceanography, and soil science.</p><p>Although mining and precious stones have been human interests throughout the history of civilization, the development of the related sciences of economic geology and mineralogy did not occur until the 18th century. The study of the earth, particularly palaeontology, blossomed in the 19th century. The growth of other disciplines, such as geophysics, in the 20th century led to the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s, which has had a similar effect on the Earth sciences as the theory of evolution had on biology. Earth sciences today are closely linked to climate research and the petroleum and mineral exploration industries.</p><h3>Physics</h3><p> Physics embodies the study of the fundamental constituents of the universe, the forces and interactions they exert on one another, and the results produced by these interactions. In general, physics is regarded as the fundamental science, because all other natural sciences use and obey the principles and laws set down by the field. Physics relies heavily on mathematics as the logical framework for formulation and quantification of principles.</p><p>The study of the principles of the universe has a long history and largely derives from direct observation and experimentation. The formulation of theories about the governing laws of the universe has been central to the study of physics from very early on, with philosophy gradually yielding to systematic, quantitative experimental testing and observation as the source of verification.</p><p>Key historical developments in physics include Isaac Newton&#8217;s theory of universal gravitation and classical mechanics, an understanding of electricity and its relation to magnetism, Einstein&#8217;s theories of special and general relativity, the development of thermodynamics, and the quantum mechanical model of atomic and subatomic physics.</p><p>The field of physics is extremely broad, and can include such diverse studies as quantum mechanics and theoretical physics, applied physics and optics. Modern physics is becoming increasingly specialized, where researchers tend to focus on a particular area rather than being &#8220;universalists&#8221; like Albert Einstein and Lev Landau, who worked in multiple areas.</p><h3>Cross-disciplines</h3><p> The distinctions between the natural science disciplines are not always sharp, and they share a number of cross-discipline fields. Physics plays a significant role in the other natural sciences, as represented by astrophysics, geophysics, chemical physics and biophysics. Likewise chemistry is represented by such fields as biochemistry, geochemistry and astrochemistry.</p><p>A particular example of a scientific discipline that draws upon multiple natural sciences is environmental science. This field studies the interactions of physical, chemical and biological components of the environment, with a particular regard to the effect of human activities and the impact on biodiversity and sustainability. This science also draws upon expertise from other fields such as economics, law and social sciences.</p><p>A comparable discipline is oceanography, as it draws upon a similar breadth of scientific disciplines. Oceanography is sub-categorized into more specialized cross-disciplines, such as physical oceanography and marine biology. As the marine ecosystem is very large and diverse, marine biology is further divided into many subfields, including specializations in particular species.</p><p>There are also a subset of cross-disciplinary fields which, by the nature of the problems that they address, have strong currents that run counter to</p><p>specialization. Put another way: In some fields of integrative application, specialists in more than one field are a key part of most dialog. Such integrative fields, for example, include nanoscience, astrobiology, and complex system informatics.</p><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article Natural science, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/natural-science-branches-of-natural-science/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Mechanics &#8211; Sub-disciplines in mechanics</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/mechanics-sub-disciplines-in-mechanics</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/mechanics-sub-disciplines-in-mechanics#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 02:51:12 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Acoustics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Analytical dynamics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Applied mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astrodynamics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biomechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biophysics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Celestial Mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Classical electromagnetism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Condensed matter physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Continuum mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Elasticity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Electromagnetism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Field theory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fluid Mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fluid statics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Formalism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Galaxies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gravitation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gravitational]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hamiltonian mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hydraulics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kinematics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lagrangian mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Least action]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mechanical equilibrium]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mechanics - sub-disciplines in mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Navigation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Newtonian mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nuclear Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Particle Physics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quantum field theory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quantum Mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quantum statistical mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Soil mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solid mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sound]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Statics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Statistical mechanics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wave Function]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/mechanics-sub-disciplines-in-mechanics</guid> <description><![CDATA[The following are two lists of various subjects that are studied in mechanics. Note that there is also the &#8220;theory of fields&#8221; which constitutes a separate discipline in physics, formally treated as distinct from mechanics, whether classical fields or quantum fields. But in actual practice, subjects belonging to mechanics and fields are closely interwoven. Thus, [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding:0 15px 15px 15px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p>The following are two lists of various subjects that are studied in mechanics.</p><p>Note that there is also the &#8220;theory of fields&#8221; which constitutes a separate discipline in physics, formally treated as distinct from mechanics, whether classical fields or quantum fields. But in actual practice, subjects belonging to mechanics and fields are closely interwoven. Thus, for instance, forces that act on particles are frequently derived from fields (electromagnetic or gravitational), and particles generate fields by acting as sources. In fact, in quantum mechanics, particles themselves are fields, as described theoretically by the wave function.</p><h3> Classical mechanics</h3><p> The following are described as forming Classical mechanics:</p><p>* Newtonian mechanics, the original theory of motion (kinematics) and forces (dynamics)</p><p>* Hamiltonian mechanics, a theoretical formalism, based on the principle of conservation of energy</p><p>* Lagrangian mechanics, another theoretical formalism, based on the principle of the least action</p><p>* Celestial mechanics, the motion of heavenly bodies: planets, comets, stars, galaxies, etc.</p><p>* Astrodynamics, spacecraft navigation, etc.</p><p>* Solid mechanics, elasticity, the properties of deformable bodies</p><p>* Acoustics, sound ( = density variation propagation) in solids, fluids and gases.</p><p>* Statics, semi-rigid bodies in mechanical equilibrium</p><p>* Fluid mechanics, the motion of fluids</p><p>* Soil mechanics, mechanical behavior of soils</p><p>* Continuum mechanics, mechanics of continua (both solid and fluid)</p><p>* Hydraulics, mechanical properties of liquids</p><p>* Fluid statics, liquids in equilibrium</p><p>* Applied mechanics, or Engineering mechanics</p><p>* Biomechanics, solids, fluids, etc. in biology</p><p>* Biophysics, physical processes in living organisms</p><p>* Statistical mechanics, assemblies of particles too large to be described in a deterministic way</p><p>* Relativistic or Einsteinian mechanics, universal gravitation</p><h3>Quantum mechanics</h3><p> The following are categorized as being part of Quantum mechanics:</p><p>* Particle physics, the motion, structure, and reactions of particles</p><p>* Nuclear physics, the motion, structure, and reactions of nuclei</p><p>* Condensed matter physics, quantum gases, solids, liquids, etc.</p><p>* Quantum statistical mechanics, large assemblies of particles</p><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article Mechanics, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/mechanics-sub-disciplines-in-mechanics/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Solar eclipse &#8211; Other observations</title><link>http://www.contour2002.org/article/solar-eclipse-other-observations</link> <comments>http://www.contour2002.org/article/solar-eclipse-other-observations#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 02:50:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Solar Eclipse]]></category> <category><![CDATA[15232]]></category> <category><![CDATA[1919]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Allais effect]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arthur eddington]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astronomers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Astronomical conjunction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Atmosphere]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Atmospheric refraction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Corona]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gemini 12]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General relativity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gravitational lens]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International Space Station]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Maurice allais]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mercury]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mir]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Novosibirsk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Photosphere]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Planet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Predictive power]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quantity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Shadow bands]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solar cycle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solar eclipse - other observations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solar eclipse of 2006 march 29]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solar eclipse of may 29]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solar eclipse on 2006 march 29]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Transit of mercury]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Transit of venus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vulcan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vulcanoid]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Weather station]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.contour2002.org/article/solar-eclipse-other-observations</guid> <description><![CDATA[For astronomers, a total solar eclipse forms a rare opportunity to observe the corona (the outer layer of the Sun&#8217;s atmosphere). Normally this is not visible because the photosphere is much brighter than the corona. According to the point reached in the solar cycle, the corona may appear small and symmetric, or large and fuzzy. [...]No related posts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="ad" style="float:left; padding:0 15px 15px 15px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0091919875977192";
/* 336x280, skapad 2011-04-06 */
google_ad_slot = "0402496911";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p> For astronomers, a total solar eclipse forms a rare opportunity to observe the corona (the outer layer of the Sun&#8217;s atmosphere). Normally this is not visible because the photosphere is much brighter than the corona. According to the point reached in the solar cycle, the corona may appear small and symmetric, or large and fuzzy. It is very hard to predict this prior to totality.</p><p>During a solar eclipse, special (indirect) observations can also be achieved with the unaided eye only. Normally the spots of light which fall through the small openings between the leaves of a tree, have a circular shape. These are images of the Sun. During a partial eclipse, the light spots will show the partial shape of the Sun, as seen on the picture.</p><p>Another famous phenomenon is shadow bands (also known as &#8221;flying shadows&#8221;), which are similar to shadows on the bottom of a swimming pool. They only occur just prior to and after totality, and are very difficult to observe. Many professional eclipse chasers have never been able to witness them.</p><p>During a partial eclipse, a related effect that can be seen is anisotropy in the shadows of objects. Particularly if the partial eclipse is nearly total, the unobscured part of the sun acts as an approximate line source of light. This means that objects cast shadows which have a very narrow penumbra in one direction, but a broad penumbra in the perpendicular direction.</p><h3>1919 observations</h3><p>Adapted from the Wikipedia article Solar eclipse, under the G. N. U. Free Documentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki</p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.contour2002.org/article/solar-eclipse-other-observations/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d10fis5p6m2fjr.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.contour2002.org @ 2012-02-10 21:00:03 -->
